Posts Tagged ‘Ida Rolf’

Ode to Peter from Big Sur

Wednesday, October 12th, 2011

Peter Melchior

Peter Melchior

Peter Melchior’s spirit and this world–class setting are inextricably entwined in my mind, though I never met him here. Never met Ida Rolf here either, but for me she is forever associated with New York via her accent and world-view, even though it was the tendrils from her sojourn at Esalen that reached out and ensnared me for a lifetime’s work.

But for me Peter’s ‘home’ was always Big Sur, no matter how many more years he domiciled in Boulder. When I first came to Big Sur in 1974, Peter was already gone, waiting in my future for our intersection in Boulder, the new home of the Rolf Institute. I was newly-Rolfed then, and an enthusiastic neophyte of the Human Potential Movement. After a day of teaching / assisting in the spiritual boot-camp of an Arica training up the road in Ventana, we would come into the famous Esalen baths after midnight. It was allowed, but it felt like sneaking in – a glimpse into the cradle of all this new work: Rolfing’s deep journeys into the body, the radical cracking open of Gestalt, the promise of peace in Alan Watts’ full-catastrophe approach to Zen meditation. It was all new and exciting.

Big Sur

It wasn’t just Esalen, it was all of Big Sur- the redwood glens reeked of good pot and the grassy tan shoulders of the hills thrummed to the sound of congas. I got to meet Jack Downing and stay at Fort Sufi perched above Pfeiffer Beach, met the illuminated Richard Price and his yet more illuminated wife Christine, and tasted the remnants the indomitable (but already gone) Fritz Perls It was heady stuff for a 25-yr old.

One night in the old cement baths, I met John Lilly up close and personal, stoned on ketamine and soft of body, hip, hair, voice, and eyes with the female hormone he was reportedly injecting. We had a long and silent conversation. (I met him many years later in London, not long before his death, still strung out on K, but very male, very thin, crew cut white hair, like nothing so much as an old oak with a masterful voice – “You a wrestler?” he boomed, as soon as he saw me. Of course he had no memory of our previous encounter, as I did.)

Ida I had met the previous spring at the ratty conference room of the Dawn Dee Motel on Santa Monica Boulevard, where Jan Sultan ‘Rolfed’ me twice a week after her class finished. I met Peter in my fraught admissions interview at 200 Abbey Place, where he gently but firmly told me to wait – but he ended up being both my auditing and practitioning teacher. For my final phase in ’76. We were with Ida for the morning lecture and demos in her advanced class, and then with Peter for the afternoon. His childlike innocence in front of Ida, working under her watchful and abrupt tutelage (now up on YouTube at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mJxajGLepyQ) belied his shamanic calm in the afternoon, when he had the six of us, including the physiatrist Dr Frank Wenger, well in hand – a steel hand in a velvet glove.

I was square in the middle of the hippie era, but I had done my homework on the beats, reading Dharma Bums and Been Down So Long It Looks Like Up To Me. Richard Farina held a special place in Peter’s musician rebel heart, as did Joan Baez. For some reason, I guess ‘cause I played music, he told me many stories of the early days in Big Sur – like folkie ‘Joanie’ Baez rockin’ out with ‘Dancin’ in the Streets’ up in Monterey.

Peter was one of the few living members of the ‘West on One’ Club. Highway 1 swoops around the ridges and into the canyons from Carmel to Morro Bay with a cliff on its western edge for most of the way, so the driver losing attention through fatigue or intoxication generally got into the West on One Club only by way of being a posthumous member. Peter fell asleep at the wheel one night, and went over the edge toward the sea, but luckily hit a tree and lived to climb back up, have 5 children, and a long and influential career.

When I got back to Esalen in the 90’s to teach a workshop, a landslide had taken the famous old baths down the hillside to the sea, and the new ones were much ‘nicer’, higher on the hill with new plumbing and a bigger view, but it was a disappointment to me, because of the treasury of memories the old tubs had. The workshops too, at that time, seemed prosaic, the consciousness deflated, the energy moribund. It seemed an era had disappeared.

Now I am back, with the ‘uh-ohs’ decade over and the twenteens begun. The baths have been restored in their old spot over the ocean. The update still leaves the feel and sense of the original baths that Michael Murphy parlayed from a family inheritance to a world-affecting center, and son Mac shows every sign of continuing.

Peter – I want to tell my old friend – they’ve done a good job. The crazies and iconoclasts are still here trying to awaken the world, as well as the smelly and beautiful youths with outlandish hair, startling body art, and charming accents, whose world is just unrolling before them. Some are hangers-on, some are cleaning up the kitchen, some are working the expanded gardens, a few still tending to the Gazebo School. Yes, they all have iPads, and the jargon has changed, but I see my ’74 self very clearly reflected in their starry eyes. Even though the Hollywood types in their shiny cars abound and there are a few new galleries for questionable art along Route 1, the Big Sur Inn is still here, and Nepenthe. Like Bali or Greece, it is still easy to shed the tourists by going just a bit off the beaten track.

Esalen itself has a bit of a new feel – that’s the nature of a change agency – but the essence of exploration and opening up is back, while the names – Rolf, Maslow, Porter’s Yurt, Gazebo school – echo back from your time here. The fog has lifted for today, and I am looking out among the sparkles for a spout or the tell-tale back of a gray whale. But my mind’s eye is looking back on your silent wisdom, when you were leviathan in my life, where the things you didn’t say had more influence on me than even the minimal maxims you did utter with that little laugh to (and at) yourself. Such a force for good, in my life and so many others, your inner silence has been my ‘Umbrella for a Hard Rain’.

That was his book of poems, the one Allen Ginsburg threw over his shoulder – Peter reported, with his same little laugh – with the brief critical review: ‘Archaic drivel!’ – but I liked them. He gave me a copy, lost in my many moves since, sad to say. Poet, raconteur, teacher, friend – Peter, you embodied the Esalen spirit. Even though you have left that body behind, the spirit endures.

SI: Formula or Process?

Monday, November 29th, 2010

An osteopath friend writes:

As a ten-fingered osteopathic physician and fasicanista who has also experienced SI and KMI from several master practitioners, I would suggest that there are times when skill overrides protocol. One of my training… mentors is Ilana Rubenfeld, Rolf’s contemporary in developing bodywork. She used to refer to Grandma Ida’s cookbook of ten recipes. Surely SI is more than formulaic!

As a DO, I have been instructed in figuring out how to use touch for diagnosis and treatment. Sadly, most DOs nowadays practice medicine as non-MDs with less overt usage of osteopathic manipulative medicine or treatment (OMM & OMT). Medical intentional therapeutic touch recommends reconsidering a finding if it reappears more than a few times– is something else needing attention or incompletely resolved? When receiving Rolfing by Tom Findley MD PhD SI and by Rosemary Feitas SI DO (alphabet soup after all our names), our work required several more sessions than ten to feel complete. Is this right or wrong?!? No!!! Yes!!!

Teachers are happiest when students take the work a step further. Let us commit to doctrine without dogma to better ourselves, further our work, and develop new models and methods as individual and our clients/patients are!

And my hot reply:

Without trying to usurp your work or your degree, I consider myself a ‘ten-fingered’ afascianado myself. One of the wonderful things about a kinesthetic conversation between two intelligent systems is that information can go both ways at once without loss of signal. (The same does not apply for spoken conversations – just tune into Fox News for proof of this assertion.) We can be feeling / assessing and treating at the same time – it’s a wonderful, protocol-free state that I imagine both you and I share in an thrive on.

Dismissing Grandma Ida’s cookbook and SI as formulaic is an easy path that many have taken before you. Not to be bellicose, but in California of the 70′s, I encountered many students of Ilana’s (not Ilana herself, I hasten to add) whose reflexive reversion to “And how’s that manifested in your life?” amounted to an unchanging protocol that soon grew tiresome.

If SI was so fixed, I doubt it would have fascinated Ida or even the likes of me for a professional lifetime. The idea of a multi-session map to the territory of the body with a beginning, a middle, and an end built into it – whether that is ten, twelve or forty steps in the process – is an idea which DO’s, DC’s, LMT’s, psychotherapists and a host of other workers could usefully incorporate.

In practice, so many of these folks go on and on treating week after week, month after month without end – and I have many personal examples of OMM DO’s in this Maine area who do this with clients I refer to them – until the client either runs out of money, or comes to their own conclusion that the treatment has lost effectiveness.

While understandable from an economic or inertia standpoint, I feel strongly that this is a bad model to work under, and hope that osteopathic schools will come to see the value in designing a treatment plan that includes a ‘recipe’ for integration, completion, and letting go.

Too few of us, in performing the neighborly function of treatment, understand the value of an endgame to complete the process, or at the very least the value of fallow periods where the body integrates without further treatment. Ida and SI understand and incorporate this value into the schooling and the ‘formula’.

If SI were actually a fixed protocol, I could sit still for the ‘Ida’s cookbook’ remark. But it is not – her recipe is defined as a series of territories, goals, considerations, all dependent for actual treatment on the wonderfully complex findings within the client.

Of course, the best meals come from using a recipe as a guide, and either adding your own spice, or even throw out the recipe altogether because it inspired you to something more interesting, or because you had other ingredients on hand. All this metaphor applies to well-done SI.

Sorry for the diatribe, my dear, you just hammered an oft-pounded thumb.

And David Lauterstein adds:

“Lovely, Tom. The first part of what you’ve written recalls a beautiful passage from “Body, Memory, and Architecture” by Charles Moore (RIP) a brilliant and kind man: “The haptic sense is the sense of touch reconsidered to include the entire body rather than merely the instruments of touch, such as the hands. To sense haptically is to experience objects in the environment by actually touching them (by climbing a mountain rather than staring at it). Treated as a perceptual system the haptic incorporates all those sensations (pressure, warmth, cold, pain and kinesthetics) which previously divided up the sense of touch, and thus it includes all those aspects of sensual detection which involve physical contact both inside and outside the body. For example, if you accidentally swallow a marble you may haptically sense it as it moves through your body, thus experiencing part of the environment within your body. Similarly, you may sense body motion haptically by detecting movement of joints and muscle through your entire bodyscape. No other sense deals as directly with the three-dimensional world or similarly carries with it the possibility of altering the environment in the process of perceiving it; that is to say, no other sense engages in feeling and doing simultaneously. This action/reaction characteristic of haptic perception separates it from all other forms of sensing which, in comparison, come to seem rather abstract.” And, as far as forms go, though I don’t practice the SI protocol (just never learned it that way), I do the ZB protocol and of course, the twelve bar blues. :)