Archive for the ‘In My Life (Pro)’ Category

Fascial Work and Pregnancy

Monday, October 24th, 2011

Are there contraindications with fascia work and pregnancy?

Of course, and very interesting ones. Briefly though and worst case first:

1) If there were a miscarriage in the first trimester (often happens around 10 weeks) or a premature delivery in the last trimester, and it was ascribed to the bodywork you did, you would feel badly even though it is highly unlikely your work would have had anything to do with it. Best to work on women who want and feel good about their pregnancy, and in the middle trimester by preference. If the pregnancy is not wanted or in any way physiologically difficult, I proceed much more cautiously.

2) In the final trimester, the hormone relaxin is beginning to loosen the connective tissue net in the body, so that the ligaments of the pelvis can relent to let the baby through – but it acts on tissues all over the body. This is a two-edged sword – it is a great time to get unusually good change because the fascia is pre-softened, but not a great time for heavy work as you can unbalance their system.

3) If you know what you are doing, you can help prepare the adductors, bottom of the pelvis, sacrum, diaphragm, and belly for the work of delivery. Those with visceral skills can help reduce any adhesions that would interfere with labor. Again: careful because of the softened tissue – do not put a lot of strain on the pubic symphysis or SI joint ligaments. The contraindication is against heavy-handed work that could put in imbalance; work slowly and always toward balance.

4) Myofascial work during pregnancy should be limited to preparation for birth or relief of pain. The mother’s body is already undergoing major structural change during the childbirthing year – now is not the time to try to impose a reconfigured posture or do a general course of myofascial work – save that for the post-partum months.

Ode to Peter from Big Sur

Wednesday, October 12th, 2011

Peter Melchior

Peter Melchior

Peter Melchior’s spirit and this world–class setting are inextricably entwined in my mind, though I never met him here. Never met Ida Rolf here either, but for me she is forever associated with New York via her accent and world-view, even though it was the tendrils from her sojourn at Esalen that reached out and ensnared me for a lifetime’s work.

But for me Peter’s ‘home’ was always Big Sur, no matter how many more years he domiciled in Boulder. When I first came to Big Sur in 1974, Peter was already gone, waiting in my future for our intersection in Boulder, the new home of the Rolf Institute. I was newly-Rolfed then, and an enthusiastic neophyte of the Human Potential Movement. After a day of teaching / assisting in the spiritual boot-camp of an Arica training up the road in Ventana, we would come into the famous Esalen baths after midnight. It was allowed, but it felt like sneaking in – a glimpse into the cradle of all this new work: Rolfing’s deep journeys into the body, the radical cracking open of Gestalt, the promise of peace in Alan Watts’ full-catastrophe approach to Zen meditation. It was all new and exciting.

Big Sur

It wasn’t just Esalen, it was all of Big Sur- the redwood glens reeked of good pot and the grassy tan shoulders of the hills thrummed to the sound of congas. I got to meet Jack Downing and stay at Fort Sufi perched above Pfeiffer Beach, met the illuminated Richard Price and his yet more illuminated wife Christine, and tasted the remnants the indomitable (but already gone) Fritz Perls It was heady stuff for a 25-yr old.

One night in the old cement baths, I met John Lilly up close and personal, stoned on ketamine and soft of body, hip, hair, voice, and eyes with the female hormone he was reportedly injecting. We had a long and silent conversation. (I met him many years later in London, not long before his death, still strung out on K, but very male, very thin, crew cut white hair, like nothing so much as an old oak with a masterful voice – “You a wrestler?” he boomed, as soon as he saw me. Of course he had no memory of our previous encounter, as I did.)

Ida I had met the previous spring at the ratty conference room of the Dawn Dee Motel on Santa Monica Boulevard, where Jan Sultan ‘Rolfed’ me twice a week after her class finished. I met Peter in my fraught admissions interview at 200 Abbey Place, where he gently but firmly told me to wait – but he ended up being both my auditing and practitioning teacher. For my final phase in ’76. We were with Ida for the morning lecture and demos in her advanced class, and then with Peter for the afternoon. His childlike innocence in front of Ida, working under her watchful and abrupt tutelage (now up on YouTube at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mJxajGLepyQ) belied his shamanic calm in the afternoon, when he had the six of us, including the physiatrist Dr Frank Wenger, well in hand – a steel hand in a velvet glove.

I was square in the middle of the hippie era, but I had done my homework on the beats, reading Dharma Bums and Been Down So Long It Looks Like Up To Me. Richard Farina held a special place in Peter’s musician rebel heart, as did Joan Baez. For some reason, I guess ‘cause I played music, he told me many stories of the early days in Big Sur – like folkie ‘Joanie’ Baez rockin’ out with ‘Dancin’ in the Streets’ up in Monterey.

Peter was one of the few living members of the ‘West on One’ Club. Highway 1 swoops around the ridges and into the canyons from Carmel to Morro Bay with a cliff on its western edge for most of the way, so the driver losing attention through fatigue or intoxication generally got into the West on One Club only by way of being a posthumous member. Peter fell asleep at the wheel one night, and went over the edge toward the sea, but luckily hit a tree and lived to climb back up, have 5 children, and a long and influential career.

When I got back to Esalen in the 90’s to teach a workshop, a landslide had taken the famous old baths down the hillside to the sea, and the new ones were much ‘nicer’, higher on the hill with new plumbing and a bigger view, but it was a disappointment to me, because of the treasury of memories the old tubs had. The workshops too, at that time, seemed prosaic, the consciousness deflated, the energy moribund. It seemed an era had disappeared.

Now I am back, with the ‘uh-ohs’ decade over and the twenteens begun. The baths have been restored in their old spot over the ocean. The update still leaves the feel and sense of the original baths that Michael Murphy parlayed from a family inheritance to a world-affecting center, and son Mac shows every sign of continuing.

Peter – I want to tell my old friend – they’ve done a good job. The crazies and iconoclasts are still here trying to awaken the world, as well as the smelly and beautiful youths with outlandish hair, startling body art, and charming accents, whose world is just unrolling before them. Some are hangers-on, some are cleaning up the kitchen, some are working the expanded gardens, a few still tending to the Gazebo School. Yes, they all have iPads, and the jargon has changed, but I see my ’74 self very clearly reflected in their starry eyes. Even though the Hollywood types in their shiny cars abound and there are a few new galleries for questionable art along Route 1, the Big Sur Inn is still here, and Nepenthe. Like Bali or Greece, it is still easy to shed the tourists by going just a bit off the beaten track.

Esalen itself has a bit of a new feel – that’s the nature of a change agency – but the essence of exploration and opening up is back, while the names – Rolf, Maslow, Porter’s Yurt, Gazebo school – echo back from your time here. The fog has lifted for today, and I am looking out among the sparkles for a spout or the tell-tale back of a gray whale. But my mind’s eye is looking back on your silent wisdom, when you were leviathan in my life, where the things you didn’t say had more influence on me than even the minimal maxims you did utter with that little laugh to (and at) yourself. Such a force for good, in my life and so many others, your inner silence has been my ‘Umbrella for a Hard Rain’.

That was his book of poems, the one Allen Ginsburg threw over his shoulder – Peter reported, with his same little laugh – with the brief critical review: ‘Archaic drivel!’ – but I liked them. He gave me a copy, lost in my many moves since, sad to say. Poet, raconteur, teacher, friend – Peter, you embodied the Esalen spirit. Even though you have left that body behind, the spirit endures.

The skeleton is a political statement

Monday, October 3rd, 2011

The classroom skeleton is a political statement – join my ‘Equal Rights for Cartilage! movement.

I am fond of making this observation – made it this weekend in San Francisco. Of course it’s a bit of a ploy, but here’s why I say so:

1) The main point is that ‘the skeleton’ doesn’t exist as a framework in the real body. Absent the soft-tissue, the skeleton would clatter to the floor in irretrievable pieces – even the cranial bones would scatter and the pelvis fall apart without the ‘grout’ of the sutural fascia. The ‘shingles’ of the facet joints lock over each other, but without the ligaments and the discs, this would not be enough to hold them together.

Add the ligamentsA dressed skeleton and the bones would mostly hold in a general relationship, but of course the whole thing would sag and fall. The muscles would drip off without the restraining (tensegrity) of the superficial and attaching fasciae. The body is a tensegrity (or at least ‘tension dependent’) dance between the myofascialature and the skeleton. The classroom skeleton makes it seem a steady frame on which the muscles can be hung, on-by-one, till it can move. Not so. Bones float in the soft-tissue, pushing out against it; soft-tissue pulls in, holding it together and holding it up in a tough but delicate tension-compression balance.

2) The hardware on a skeleton gives many false impressions – the bones of the feet wired together with no movement at the sub-talar joint, giving the casual observer a false idea about the ankle in eversion and inversion. The fibula would fall without wire ties, etc. And then there’s that metal rod up its bum from sacrum to skull. Modern skeletons seem to have given up wiring the ribs to the neck (which at least imitated the scalenes) for an entirely unrealistic rod between the front of the throacic spine and the back of the sternum – talk about a spear through the heart!

The scapula is usually nailed to the rib cage, giving the impression that the arm appendage starts at the gleno-humeral joint, instead of the sterno-clavicular joint.

Most cheap skeletons have U-joint hardware at the shoulder and hip, which works well enough for most demonstration purposes, but spoils our sense of the biomechanics of the rotator cuff and the psoas complex. More expensive models have gone to flexible spines and bungee cord joint connectors, which, though they give up the ghost sooner than the metal hardware, are much more accurate in ball and socket mechanics.

3) But the worst of all is the choice of which cartilage to include and which to ignore. Most include the pubic symphysis, the intervertebral discs, and the costal cartilages between the ends of the ribs and the sternum. Some plastic skeletons include the knee menisci.

Most skeletons wire the hyoid bone to the front of the neck vertebrae, which is accurate positioning, but inaccurate in function. None to my knowledge include the laryngeal crichoid, or tracheal cartilages under the hyoid, which extend down into the bronchae and bronchioles before terminating in the (epithelial) alveoli. Neither are the ear nor nose cartilages or the linings of the eustachian tubes included.

Of course most bones start as cartilage and are progressively ossified, so the decision of which cartilages to include is a matter of convenience and production costs, which I appreciate. But nevertheless, it is a political statement of inclusion and exclusion. An inclusive skeleton would have these cartilages of the throat and chest, and would suggest a ‘visceral’ skeleton (an idea I lifted from Jon Zahourek) to add to the axial and the two parts of appendicular skeleton. This visceral skeleton would include the ‘breastplate’ of the sternum and costal cartilages, the pulmonary cartilages mentioned – the entire upside-down tree of the respiratory and vocal superstructure, plus the hyoid, mandible, maxillary, palatine, zygomatic, nasal, and lacrimal bones – mostly derived from the proto-gill arches of the embryo. The head scratcher in this would be the vomer: firmly in the nose, it seems part of this visceral skeleton, but it could also be seen as the ‘spinous process of the sphenoid ‘vertebra’.

A Short Bibliography

Monday, September 19th, 2011

To follow my line of thought in the bodywork / movement field:

  • Body and Mature Behaviour, Feldenkrais (and anything else he’s written, but this is the 1949 masterwork, never been equaled)
    The Thinking Body, Mabel Todd
    Rolfing, Ida Rolf
    Amazing Babies (DVD), Beverly Stokes
    Fascia and Membrane Technique, Schwind
    Trail Guide to the Body (no profundity here, but a very useful book)
    The Heart of Listening, Milne
    Sensing, Feeling and Action, Bainbridge-Cohen
    Embryogenesis, Grossinger
    How Life Moves, McHose and Frank
    Primal Health, Odent
    Touching, Montague
  • And, selfishly, Anatomy Trains and the Kinesthetic Dystonia set.

    Take the Anatomiken and Equiniken course(s) from Jon Kahourek

    General

  • The Magus, John Fowles (1st edition if possible)
    Operating Manual for SpaceShip Earth (or Critical Path, or Utopia or Oblivion), Buckminster Fuller
    Ida Rolf Talks, Feitis (ed.)
    Picture Palace, Paul Theroux
    Einstein’s Dreams, Lightmen
    Journey to Ixtlan, Castaneda
    Meetings with Remarkable Men, Gurdjieff
    Boyhood with G
  • urdjieff, Peters

    Right now:

  • The Root of Thought, Kopp
    The Evolution of the Head, Leidler
    The Brain That Changes Itself, Doidge
    Muscles and Meridians, Beech
  • Working with Older Clients

    Thursday, July 7th, 2011

    Susan Carbin Hardee, one of our recent graduates, wrote this short essay about working with senior citizen clients:

    A question I ask is, “What can we offer our older clients?” Though their connective tissues are often less hydrated and less malleable, (and changes harder to see in a photograph) they can nevertheless experience great depth of change within themselves. My class model “Wilma” was a friend of Tom’s who is 70 years old. Her comments ran to: “I have so much more energy, I feel taller, I feel wonderful and better than I have in ages, my balance is improved, my breathing is so much better and my anxiety has diminished significantly.”

    Wilma’s new love is “Harold,” 76 years old. Harold also went through the twelve series during our training. They were in the clinic room at the same time, and it was sweet that they have this budding relationship and were approaching something so bold and different together. He has a Ph.D. in applied math or something, and has followed unusual growth paths through his life. Tom imagines Wilma would not have agreed to the 12 series without his encouragement. This can be a time for older people to begin new directions and settle old issues somatically. It was a positive experience for both of them, I believe that put a spring in their step. The phrase I used when writing to Tom was “a new kind of after-12 photo”. Usually people are in their underwear and it may be hard to see their glow coming through!

    Harold was the classroom model of Eduardo Colon, another student in the class. He wrote, “I’ve done traditional physical therapy work with many older clients but I wasn’t sure what to expect before I went through the 12 series with Harold. Postural problems can be developed over a lifetime and with age, become more resistant to change. While we achieved modest improvement with his posture and overall range of motion, I found the results of the work to be profound when working with postural issues due to medical problems.

    “I kept in mind that I’d be working with less hydrated tissue, heightened sensitivities and sometimes a larger list of pathologies to consider when approaching the work. I’d be stimulating physical and mental sensory to a level he was most likely unfamiliar with. With age, we can become conditioned mentally and physically, becoming less susceptible to change, and we develop more defined comfort zones, so I’d need to be very aware of his response and communicate the process consistently.

    “Harold’s structural imperfections of note included excessive forward head posture, a left shoulder prone to dislocation, and lateral rotation in the right leg. I made a few modifications to the work due to a recent surgery, using a lighter touch in the affected area. This modification was even more so for his own sense of well being and comfort than it was to prevent any type of injury.

    Harold was hesitant to receive the work at first, and reported slight discomfort. It was difficult to gain his trust and open his mind to the experience, but as we experienced results, the collaboration between us strengthened. After session 4 (spiral line session) we began to notice dramatic improvements in his leg. This shocked me because Harold has a rod in his tibia and screws in his ankle, and I was unsure how it would effect the treatment. By the end of the 12 series, the difference was night and day, the lateral rotation in his leg was gone.

    “I was unsure if Structural Integration could make such a significant change with an older client, but surely enough the results are there. It was very reaffirming to me, and reassured me that SI can bring results no matter who you are or who you are working with.”

    Creating a Structural Integration Practice

    Friday, June 24th, 2011

    The following is my accumulated wisdom about starting and building a practice in SI. One the one hand, I have built a number of successful practices – about 20 or so, both residential and visiting, during my 28 years of practice. On the other, I have known good practitioners who had a lot of trouble getting going, so this list is perhaps incomplete because of factors of which I am not aware.

    All my practices have been solely Structural Integration, so some of this may not apply to those of you who combine modalities.

    But I hope this is useful anyway.

    Locating yourself: The first question is, where to practice? If you are already ‘home’ with no plans to move, then move to the next section.
    There are three basic categories: a city, a town, or rural (City = 500k or more, Town = 50 – 200k, anything less than that is essentially rural).

    If you locate in a large city, plan on concentrating on one group of clients for a while, like yoga students or some such, as it is simply not possible to have your fingers in all the pies at the beginning. Build a reputation in one group and the others will eventually filter in. It can take time (and a money reserve) to build a practice in a city, unless you have an ‘in’, a link (see below). In a city, it really doesn’t matter how many other practitioners are already there, there’s room for you regardless.

    If you locate rurally, plan to take all comers, and perhaps to work on a sliding scale of fees. Be especially careful about dual relationships, as they are unavoidable here – your clients are also your friends, or your shopkeeper or mechanic at least, so different rules of interaction apply. If there are other SI practitioners in your rural area, make friends and stay friends – you share a lot more than you compete.

    Perhaps the best place to locate for a beginning practice is a moderately sized town.

    Here there are two categories: the way desirable and the average. The way desirable includes Asheville, Aspen, Boulder, Kihei, Santa Fe, Sedona, Taos, and the like. If you locate in one of these places, bring a bankroll, as starting a practice will take a year or so. There are usually more practitioners (SI and others) than the population will bear, so you are left with working with the rich visitors / residents (again, you need a link to start) or working with the rest of the supporting crew. Since these are often living hand-to-mouth, this often involves a period of trades or freebies before the money starts to roll in. Once established, of course, you have a very desirable practice, but be prepared to invest some time.

    The non-flashy small city / large town is the easiest and to my mind the best place to get started. It gives you a wide variety of practice experience, a chance to gain confidence and skill while paying off your debts, in a place you are not necessarily committed to for the rest of your life or practice.

    Obviously, the number of competing SI practitioners can be a factor here, but don’t be scared off by one or two others. Count the number of chiropractors in the phone book, and divide by four to see roughly how many SI practitioners a town will support. In a more educated or hip town, reduce the ratio to 1:3.

    In a town of this size, you can have your finger in a lot of pies – the local sports scene, arts scene, therapeutic and medical community – a spread you simply cannot maintain in a large city. This gives you breadth of client experience, no bad thing for the beginner.

    Landing cold in a town where you know no one is sobering. But you have a valuable and marketable skill, and you want to share it. People like this work, and they will pay you for it – you just have to let them know.

    Ultimately, being where you love is important, and if you really want to be somewhere, go there and make it work. On the other hand, perching for a few years in some town that means less to you, but where you will get lots of work experience, is no bad thing either. You can then arrive at your chosen dream with more confidence.

    Working overseas: While it is a wonderful thing for an American to live for a time outside our superficial consumption-driven, convenience-laden culture, it is not as easy as it once was for Americans to just land somewhere and start a practice. I did this 25 years ago, and it was easier then. In London, I built my practice from scratch; in most other cases, I had some form of captive audience or an ‘in’ – a local contact who delivered my a batch of clients or at least an audience to listen to my pitch.

    Since that time, many things have happened – there is more regulation of alternative medicine, in the European countries at least, and much more native competition has been trained in. Working under the table is harder than it once was. Countries in Asia and South America are probably still easier practice in this way, but then you have their economy to think about.

    Finding clients: Now that you are located, how do you find clients?

    Here’s what not to do: Put your card up in the health food store and an ad in the local New Age or straight paper, and sit home waiting for the phone to ring. This goes nowhere. In fact, I advise against doing either of these things in the beginning.

    A website might be a bit better these electronic days than these two strike outs, but:

    Facebook is undeniably valuable – not around when I opened practices, but these days, essential – and worth the time you need to put in it. If you have a well-connected contact where you are arriving, maybe they will let you use their email list. Any and all these things are fine, but:

    Practices are built on personal relationships. All the following suggestions simply lead to opportunities for building the relationships that make practices hum and thrive. Breaking the initial ice is the hardest part.

    First, though, preparation: Aim high, then take what you get. Invest in high quality business cards or printing for your practice materials (like the ‘Getting the Most From Your KMI Sessions’ piece), and/or for your practice space itself. It is false economy to take a grotty practice space because it’s cheap, or to have flimsy or badly printed materials to describe your work. If one of these economies is unavoidable, make sure the rest of your presentation counterbalances that aspect. This shows basic respect for yourself and your work.

    Having prepped in this way, take anyone who comes. Think long and hard before you turn down a client. A raging paranoid, yes. Almost anyone else is a good candidate for learning and expanding your skill. I was 12 years in practice before I started deflecting potential clients. Just be honest and humble about the promises you make, especially to the very ill or the desperate (see the sociology lesson below).

    Go to parties. Don’t stalk partygoers, but do have a few cards in your pocket. Such gatherings are prime places to establish relationships where you can share your enthusiasm for your work. No need to push – “What do you do?” is a standard question for an American to ask a new acquaintance.

    Take classes, or join a club: Taking a class in something you like – yoga, martial arts, Pilates, whatever – or join a club like biking or chess or another of your genuine interests. Same procedure as above.

    Speak at groups or classes: Your community is full of groups who need a speaker for meetings. Divorce Perspectives, health clubs, New Age groups or stores, even Rotary, God bless ‘em – these groups are great places to hone your skills at presenting SI. Also, yoga or martial arts or dance group classes may let you come and speak briefly to them before or after a class. (See lecture / demos below.)

    Be prepared for a flat reception, but make sure you put your number up somewhere or leave cards around. It’s a big step for most folks to commit to something new in full view of their peers, but a few will call you privately after the event.

    Get you and your practice editorial copy: The most effective and least expensive advertising is a story in the body of the paper. You’re new in town; the publishers are looking for new stories. Contact all the papers or local mags and rags, and see if you can get an article printed. Sometimes they take a while, but it is a surprisingly worthwhile investment of time.

    Do presentations or lecture/demos: This is like speaking to a group, but you organize it yourself for the public. If you have no ‘in’ – someone who likes you who is bringing loads of people – then prepping for this is hard work. How often do you go out for an evening to hear a lecture from someone trying to sell you his or her service? But if other ice-breakers are not working, this can get you the few folks you need to get started. These lecture/demos are good to do when you first get settled. Especially do this if you get some copy in the local rag (as above). Take an ad for your lecture demo in the same issue that your article appears (this will make the editor happy also).

    This is the time to pepper the town with posters – the health food store, the coffee shop, the theater, library, drugstore, any place where people gather. Repeat your postering, as they are often covered over shortly. Unblushingly twist any arms you can to get people there – the more the better, even if they are already friends, and especially if they are already clients. Clients are your best mouthpieces. And talking about this work to a group of three people can be deadly – but do it if you have to.

    The rules for lecture/demos are few but strong:

    1) Have some materials out, as some people will be shy and simply take some stuff along to read.
    2) Have some food or drink there – a bowl of fruit and water is fine if you can’t afford more, but it gets people talking.
    3) Be brief in your talk – 20 minutes max, then open it up for questions. People want to hear about the benefits, what it will and will not do, they want to know you are not crazy or sadistic, and they want to hear your enthusiasm. Long explanations about fascia and the recipe are likely to fall on deaf ears. Talk from your experience, as a client or as a practitioner. This works, and nothing else does.
    4) Before questions begin to dwindle, offer to show the work on someone. I’m sorry, but if given the choice between a geeky guy and the pretty girl, take the pretty one. I don’t know why, but I have often been presented with variants of this choice. Believe me: to get more clients, take the more ‘normal’ one.
    5) Do about 10 minutes worth of work, 20 max. They want to see you are not going to rip their flesh off the bone. Usually I do first session work around the sternum and ribs, as this often produces visible changes in the breathing, but iliac crest and trochanter, foot work, or bench work can be fine too, depending on your model’s pattern. If there’s big change, your day is made. If not – well, it’s only been a few minutes work, the effects are cumulative, and so on. Either way, bring the event to a close soon after your work is done.
    6) Have your appointment book handy. Do not be shy to make appointments on the spot.

    Giving freebies: This is a dubious strategy which I seldom used, but others have used to great advantage. The danger is disrespecting yourself and giving so much away that it gets hard to draw the line and start to charge. Never give away more than one session per customer. In the rare times when I did offer a free session, I often take a careful history and talk about what the person wants, and then give a demos worth – 15-20 minutes or so – of work, and leave them to think it over. Other practitioners give the initial interview and assessment for free as a matter of standard policy. Having the prospective client in front of a mirror where you can point out their structural pattern, compensations, and imbalances is quite effective in enrolling them in the idea of structural change.

    Approaching the busy practitioner: One place where freebies are very effective and worthwhile is with the busy practitioner. Find out who the busy folks are in your town. This can take some digging on your part, as they are so busy they don’t need to advertise. This could include a doctor friendly to alternatives, a chiropractor, a PT, a psychotherapist, a yoga or dance teacher – anyone in the healing or movement education trade. It is perhaps more difficult with someone who could conceive of themselves as competitive – another SI practitioner or massage therapist – but hey, nothing ventured, nothing gained.
    Get hold of this person – in person if possible, rather than just the phone – and offer them a session so that they can understand what it is you are doing. Be prepared to offer it on their terms – on their time, maybe at their place – they’re busy! If they like what you do, they will be the most likely people to refer clients on to you – their most difficult, chronic and intractable people, probably – isn’t that who you would refer on? If you have success with any of these people, then more referrals are likely to come your way. Stay in communication – not bothersome, but reporting back in on this client or that. In this way you build a network. If you can and it’s appropriate, refer other people back to them,

    Forging links: The above way of linking with successful practitioners is one way of forging links. Forging links, getting connected, making friends, getting an ‘in’ – however you want to put it, this is the most important sine qua non of building and maintaining a practice.

    Some of you have heard my story of arriving in London, deciding to start a practice there, and going out to a seminar where the leader had invited me to come and ‘share’ about my work. The seminar (est, if anyone remembers) was run with a lot of ‘enrollment’ rigamarole, and I got to feeling stroppy and rebellious. I never did stand up to share about my work to the 100 or so people attending the seminar, but my stroppiness attracted the attention of the guy sitting next to me. He and his wife gave me a ride home, and they were among my first clients. They must have sent me 30 people in the next few months.

    The point being that one good contact is worth 50 lesser ones. This one happened by accident, essentially, but I have learned to look for these ‘opinion leaders’. So now, for my last bit of wisdom, to the sociology lesson:

    A sociology lesson: Those who study the spread of innovative ideas among groups tell us that there are three sub-groups within any given group you care to identify: the innovators, the opinion leaders, and the followers. (Understand that any one person might be an innovator in one group, and simultaneously an opinion leader in another group – the roles are fluid.) If you define the group as your potential clients, everyone wants to get the opinion leaders in the community onto their table, as the followers all watch the opinion leaders, and do what they do or what they suggest.

    The trick here, the essential understanding, is that the opinion leaders never do anything first; they watch the innovators, and if the innovators have a good experience, the opinion leaders will give it a try. So in any given group, you have to convince the innovators first. Most people go for the opinion leaders first, and wonder why they can’t convince them. Go for the innovators first.
    So who are the innovators? The crazy, the desperate, and the artists. The people who are a little nuts are often less comfortable in the social life, and therefore risk-takers. The folks who have intractable pain, or are ill with something that no one can figure out are also prepared to try something new in hopes that it will break the logjam. Artists are by definition out there and prepared to think differently. Go for these folks first; the opinion leaders will come if the innovators have a successful experience, and the rest will follow as the night the day.

    Maintaining contact: Finally, in order to maintain your practice, it pays to maintain contact with your former clients. A six-month follow up call or letter, the occasional ‘press release’ when you do some new training or have a new practice address or something (anything) to announce – any of these will help remind folks that you are there, and spur them to come in for some follow-up / advanced sessions, or send someone else in need of your services.

    Employment situations: All of the foregoing was aimed for those with private, self-owned practices. Some of you may find yourself as an employee, as in a chiropractic office or a spa or a multi-disciplinary clinic. Since I have not been in those situations myself, I cannot be very helpful, but I imagine that much of what’s here still applies.

    Expansion and Contraction

    Monday, June 6th, 2011

    A student recently asked me to discuss prenatal and postpartum fascial changes in terms of “normal” tension, moving to expansion and contraction. So, I’d like to talk about this in three ways:

    1) Movement function: You can see the body as seven hinged ‘masses’ (meaning heavy bits: the head, chest, pelvis, arms and legs) with six rotational ‘spaces’ or swivels in between (the neck, waist, shoulders, and hips). In pregnancy, you add a large incompressible mass into the waist section. In early pregnancy, this makes little difference, but by the last months, and the last two weeks in particular, the weight of the baby and the amniotic fluid tend to lock together the rib cage and the pelvis masses into on big mass. This puts special movement requirements on the woman in late pregnancy (not to mention difficulty breathing – ever tried running upstairs in the ninth month?).

    Clinically, I find many women need restoration of the rotational aspect of the waist, and that exercises and awarenesses that go in this direction are very helpful.

    2) Tissue stretching: Without doubt, the growth of a baby stretches tissue, a day at a time, and of course the pelvic floor tissues in a hell of a hurry. Linea alba diastasis, stretch marks in the dermal layer, and a less-than-adequate pelvic floor tone are all common sequelae from pregnancy and delivery. Inevitably, the uterus sits more forward than backward, because of the lumbar spine behind. All the abdominal muscles and fasciae are stretched, and despite the well-toned mother’s best efforts, the baby tends to stick out over the pubic bone in late pregnancy. This position puts great strain on many organ and ligament attachments – too many to predict, as it depends on the mother’s posture and the baby’s position.

    Assisted restoration can use bodywork, exercise, and such devices as sacral belts when necessary. Natural restoration varies due to the mother’s inherent fascial elasticity, muscle tone, and nutrition – and whether they are nursing or not.

    3) Birth hormones: A cousin of oxytocin called relaxin is secreted in the mother’s body starting a bit before birth (it varies) and some time after birth (longer with nursing), and this causes fascia all over the body to relent a little – making the mother a bit like someone with ligamentous laxity or hypermobility. It’s a good idea to release the ligaments around the pelvis to make the birth easier, but it makes restoration harder.

    Oxytocin is also the love drug, and fixates the mother on the child, to the detriment, sometimes, of herself. Good bodywork soon after delivery can be vital in restoring proper span to the pelvic floor and proper joint relations, but often the mother is ignoring her own feelings in favor of the baby’s well-being. It is up to us, members of her community, to make sure she gets the proper post-natal care. I have a very baby-friendly practice – on the breast, on your stomach, beside you on the table, beside the table in a basket – whatever the mom wants. But get in here and get the pelvis re-aligned before the relaxin disappears (certainly by about 6 months in most) and restoration gets harder.

    In general, fascial tissues restore slower than muscular ones, though muscular effort can aid the fascial restoration. Fascial tears or adhesions will slow or distort muscle action. Malalignment in the SI joints or pubic symphysis affects both. All these are most easily adjusted and combed out in the first couple of months after birth.

    In a proper society, we will make sure that all mothers have sustained pre- and post-partum structural care that will ease the birth process and speed the restoration to full function afterward.

    Multinucleated muscle cells

    Wednesday, February 23rd, 2011

    A teacher writes:
    My question is about the “onion bag” you used to show the configuration of locked long vs locked short. My understanding was that when the diamonds are eccentrically shortened (the width of the onion bag) we want create shearing-like motions with the roller or cross fiber friction while when the diamonds are shortened concentrically we want to lengthen them from origin to Insertion. I remember reading about the beehive like structures of the Multinucleated muscle cell — is this where the image of the onion bag comes from?

    My reply:
    The diamond bag thing is a bit of a metaphor, but only a bit, if you look at Purslow’s pic of endomysium, its fibers are oriented at the requisite onion bag (60 degrees).

    Multinucleated muscle cells – sausages – lie within this honeycomb. Imagine it being stretched or loaded eccentrically – the white collagen fibers (the GAG’s are invisible but Guimbertovianly present ) would line up from left to right, and the bonding would be from top to bottom in the picture, and hence the cross-fiber work.

    Concentrically contract and the fibers would lie more vertical in this orientation, and thus when stuck that way would bond more left-to-right — and therefore we open-break-melt the bonding by going along the muscle.

    An Ode to J.C. Guimberteau

    Monday, February 7th, 2011

    Dear Dr Guimberteau:

    I am writing to express my profound appreciation of your work, which has been invaluable to so many of us who are traversing the edge of the medical field, seeking better models from and for the body in motion, and for a better use of the self.

    Your unique images of ‘living matter’ – showing how the matrix accommodates so vitally and immediately to the shifting tension, compression and shear forces – create an instant shift in perception that can never be undone in anyone who views them. Your data flies in the face of ‘established’ truths, but the images call to mind so many diverse poetic images that they can only be true.

    When someone makes such an earth-shattering discovery, which no practitioner can see and remain unchanged, it is tempting to see only the result, and say, ‘That was easy,” or “Wasn’t he lucky” – both reactions are versions of “Why didn’t I think of that?”

    I was cleaning up my office (a perennial frustration) in preparation for tackling my own next book and came across the text on hand surgery you gave me last spring when I visited you and your clinic in Bordeaux with Mistral. Leafing through this book again, I was impressed with how your discoveries were no lucky find, but a painstaking exploration that had many avenues (some of them surely blind).

    You obviously made many forays into new techniques based on novel concepts, with many attempts at photos and other examinations before you hit on the camera and technique that has so many implications for both the medical and the peri-medical world.

    So allow me to take this opportunity to salute you and thank you – the groundbreaking work in Strolling, to which you have added the look upward into the basis of the skin in Excursion, and down into the muscles in Attitudes. Each has added to our understanding of the properties, architecture not just of the surface areas, but all areas where movement has to happen in the body.

    The fact is, although I know you have been at it for many years, the implications from your insights are only beginning to trickle out , where they are having will have, I predict, a subtle but profound effect on everyone who considers the question of “How Life Moves”.

    I am one of those people changed forever by seeing what you have documented. I know that this is but one step for you along an endless and circuitous path that leads wherever it leads. It takes a curious mind and a determined heart to follow a path so far and with such thoroughness and élan. Hail to thee!

    Tom Myers

    Fascia and Emotion

    Monday, January 31st, 2011

    A reader writes,

    Dear Mr. Myers:

    I have read and re-read your fascinating article on the sensory role of fascia that was published in Massage and Bodywork Nov/Dec 2010.

    I have a question, with sort of a long build up, and I have posed this question to many people. Most of them say “I dunno.” With all your research and experience, you are no doubt in the best position to answer it, and I hope that you might think about actually answering me.

    OK, first, my story. I am a fairly minted [therapist], who came into massage school as a middle aged woman…. and at one time was a ‘hard scientist’ (geologist). My family and my schooling all emphasized science and discounted intuition or any other “woo”-based fuzzy thinking. So I was very good at the A&P and Pathology, loved the nuts and bolts aspects of the work. To my incredible surprise, however, I discovered my real aptitude was for polarity and craniosacral work. I have furthered my studies in both fields, and have discovered just how important the intuitive part of the bodywork can be.

    However, I still worship at the altar of the fascia. I can feel its motion, when it releases… and quite often, 1 will have these sort of intuitive flashes as the fascia changes. What I sense in my hands feels almost electric in nature, and it is at times accompanied by a sense of emotion, color, or a visual image of some kind. I have ended up doing very little ‘relaxing’ massage in my practice, but a lot of very gentle myofascial release, unwinding, or whatever you want to call it, and have found a huge effect in my clients’ outcomes.

    When I read your article anbd realized the hufge amount of nerve endings that are involved in the fascia, not to mention the idea that emotions are stored everywhere in the body, a light went on for me. My scientific brain still wants to explain why I experience what I do as I lay my hands on a client.

    So, my question for you is this:

    Is it possible that what I sense in my hands, that “electric” feeling, is the electric discharge of the nerve endings in the fascia? For example, I usually get a feeling, almost like static electricity, from irritated muscles, then as the fascia/ muscle releases, I will get a feeling of opening and discharge of energy from the client.

    Could that also be why I can get a feeling of emotion as my client releases it? In my limited experience, I have already seen some profound stuff coming out of people’s bodies, and I have participated in it with them in the sense that what I “see” or feel leads me to ask them questions which have aided in their letting go of memories or emotions in the course of their treatment.

    I really just want to know if I am barking up the right tree or not. It has been a long and occasionally strange journey to accepting that I have some intuitive sense when I work with my clients, and the left brain is still struggling with the why aspect.

    In any case, I am cutting out that article and will hang onto it for a long time. It really made me think for a long time about how anatomy is taught as well, and maybe that it ought to be reframed with the fascia taught first, then filling in the framework with the cellular stuff.

    Thank you for taking the time to read this, even if you think it is all nonsense.

    Best wishes

    Ellen S.

    Dear Ellen,

    The dance between science (meaning hard science) and intuition is an old one. Intuition is a form of knowing (scientis) too, but a hard one on which to find agreement . ‘Trusting your intuition’ is good advice for your practice, but not very good advice for publishing, at least without a lot of caveats.

    The extent of sensory endings in the fascia could be one form in which the electric forms of ‘release’ could be registered by your polarized hands. Remember, though, that there are no motor nerves in fascia to ‘relax’ the fascia – all the motor end plates are on muscles, not in the fascia itself, so releases you feel on the neurological level have to be happening in muscles.

    But do not neglect the other possible avenues: The fascial net is itself a polarized, ionized, electric network, independent of the nerves within it. Fibrocytes, orteocytes, and chondrocytes are among the cells that have lots of integrin receptors into the body-wide tensional matrix – I refer you to the first chapter of my book, and the work of Donald Ingber among others who have done such great work to document this – that can have the effect of releasing the fascia independently, or co-dependently, with any stretching or visco-elastic change in the matrix itself. Understanding this tensional network is work that is proceeding apace in the hard science realm. Langevin’s work on cellular communication and distant effects of acupuncture within the fascial system is a prime example.

    The connection to emotional reality is much harder to document – I personally dislike terms like ‘muscle memory’, and even ‘cellular memory’ has to be taken with some salt – but is a daily reality for those of us reaching into the human experience through reaching the actual physical tissues that make up that reality.

    Of course, none of these systems – the nerves, the fascia, or the chemistry of the fluids, which is where I believe such emotional charges are stored, but it’s a hunch – are ever separate – they all grow and develop together, in full and unavoidable communication. So separating these systems and trying to parse them out for the ‘why’ question is an analytical task that may prove impossible without a holistic new paradigm, which is emerging day-by-day.

    Absolutely, the fascial network should be taught first, and then the other bits filled in – or at least that’s how I do it in my classes. But the distance remains between the hard data and the practitioner’s felt sense, though the gap is closing fast. At the most global level, the WHY is in the patterning – neural patterning, fluid chemistry patterning, and fascial patterning – and the releases are shifts in the patterning – but the mechanisms remain to be explained.

    The trouble with woo-woo fuzzy thinking is that it is not replicable or share-able in that special way that science has. The trouble with banishing fuzzy thinking is that no problem gets solved with the tools that created it – and fuzzy thinking is the only way to start getting beyond our current set of thinking tools. We could go into Bachelard’s epistemology here, but it would take a while to explain. In short, WHY, at the level of cause and effect, is a very good tool. At the level of relational thinking – relativity applied to life sciences – WHY is a dirty word.

    As consciousness science gets more traction, intention and emotion should become more understandable in terms of their physical underpinning. in the meantime, follow your intuition, but maintain your skepticism as to the cause and means.

    As the Islamic proverb has it: Trust in God and tie your camel.

    Tom Myers