A reader writes,
Dear Mr. Myers:
I have read and re-read your fascinating article on the sensory role of fascia that was published in Massage and Bodywork Nov/Dec 2010.
I have a question, with sort of a long build up, and I have posed this question to many people. Most of them say “I dunno.” With all your research and experience, you are no doubt in the best position to answer it, and I hope that you might think about actually answering me.
OK, first, my story. I am a fairly minted [therapist], who came into massage school as a middle aged woman…. and at one time was a ‘hard scientist’ (geologist). My family and my schooling all emphasized science and discounted intuition or any other “woo”-based fuzzy thinking. So I was very good at the A&P and Pathology, loved the nuts and bolts aspects of the work. To my incredible surprise, however, I discovered my real aptitude was for polarity and craniosacral work. I have furthered my studies in both fields, and have discovered just how important the intuitive part of the bodywork can be.
However, I still worship at the altar of the fascia. I can feel its motion, when it releases… and quite often, 1 will have these sort of intuitive flashes as the fascia changes. What I sense in my hands feels almost electric in nature, and it is at times accompanied by a sense of emotion, color, or a visual image of some kind. I have ended up doing very little ‘relaxing’ massage in my practice, but a lot of very gentle myofascial release, unwinding, or whatever you want to call it, and have found a huge effect in my clients’ outcomes.
When I read your article anbd realized the hufge amount of nerve endings that are involved in the fascia, not to mention the idea that emotions are stored everywhere in the body, a light went on for me. My scientific brain still wants to explain why I experience what I do as I lay my hands on a client.
So, my question for you is this:
Is it possible that what I sense in my hands, that “electric” feeling, is the electric discharge of the nerve endings in the fascia? For example, I usually get a feeling, almost like static electricity, from irritated muscles, then as the fascia/ muscle releases, I will get a feeling of opening and discharge of energy from the client.
Could that also be why I can get a feeling of emotion as my client releases it? In my limited experience, I have already seen some profound stuff coming out of people’s bodies, and I have participated in it with them in the sense that what I “see” or feel leads me to ask them questions which have aided in their letting go of memories or emotions in the course of their treatment.
I really just want to know if I am barking up the right tree or not. It has been a long and occasionally strange journey to accepting that I have some intuitive sense when I work with my clients, and the left brain is still struggling with the why aspect.
In any case, I am cutting out that article and will hang onto it for a long time. It really made me think for a long time about how anatomy is taught as well, and maybe that it ought to be reframed with the fascia taught first, then filling in the framework with the cellular stuff.
Thank you for taking the time to read this, even if you think it is all nonsense.
Best wishes
Ellen S.
Dear Ellen,
The dance between science (meaning hard science) and intuition is an old one. Intuition is a form of knowing (scientis) too, but a hard one on which to find agreement . ‘Trusting your intuition’ is good advice for your practice, but not very good advice for publishing, at least without a lot of caveats.
The extent of sensory endings in the fascia could be one form in which the electric forms of ‘release’ could be registered by your polarized hands. Remember, though, that there are no motor nerves in fascia to ‘relax’ the fascia – all the motor end plates are on muscles, not in the fascia itself, so releases you feel on the neurological level have to be happening in muscles.
But do not neglect the other possible avenues: The fascial net is itself a polarized, ionized, electric network, independent of the nerves within it. Fibrocytes, orteocytes, and chondrocytes are among the cells that have lots of integrin receptors into the body-wide tensional matrix – I refer you to the first chapter of my book, and the work of Donald Ingber among others who have done such great work to document this – that can have the effect of releasing the fascia independently, or co-dependently, with any stretching or visco-elastic change in the matrix itself. Understanding this tensional network is work that is proceeding apace in the hard science realm. Langevin’s work on cellular communication and distant effects of acupuncture within the fascial system is a prime example.
The connection to emotional reality is much harder to document – I personally dislike terms like ‘muscle memory’, and even ‘cellular memory’ has to be taken with some salt – but is a daily reality for those of us reaching into the human experience through reaching the actual physical tissues that make up that reality.
Of course, none of these systems – the nerves, the fascia, or the chemistry of the fluids, which is where I believe such emotional charges are stored, but it’s a hunch – are ever separate – they all grow and develop together, in full and unavoidable communication. So separating these systems and trying to parse them out for the ‘why’ question is an analytical task that may prove impossible without a holistic new paradigm, which is emerging day-by-day.
Absolutely, the fascial network should be taught first, and then the other bits filled in – or at least that’s how I do it in my classes. But the distance remains between the hard data and the practitioner’s felt sense, though the gap is closing fast. At the most global level, the WHY is in the patterning – neural patterning, fluid chemistry patterning, and fascial patterning – and the releases are shifts in the patterning – but the mechanisms remain to be explained.
The trouble with woo-woo fuzzy thinking is that it is not replicable or share-able in that special way that science has. The trouble with banishing fuzzy thinking is that no problem gets solved with the tools that created it – and fuzzy thinking is the only way to start getting beyond our current set of thinking tools. We could go into Bachelard’s epistemology here, but it would take a while to explain. In short, WHY, at the level of cause and effect, is a very good tool. At the level of relational thinking – relativity applied to life sciences – WHY is a dirty word.
As consciousness science gets more traction, intention and emotion should become more understandable in terms of their physical underpinning. in the meantime, follow your intuition, but maintain your skepticism as to the cause and means.
As the Islamic proverb has it: Trust in God and tie your camel.
Tom Myers